
Recent online discussions have brought a curious phenomenon to the forefront: the potential impact of data center infrasound. While data centers are typically associated with the hum of servers and the roar of cooling systems, claims have emerged, notably from individuals like Benn Jordan, suggesting that these facilities might be emitting harmful sub-audible frequencies. This article aims to explore these claims, examine the scientific understanding of infrasound, and present the evidence that debunks the notion of significant health risks stemming from data center operations. We will delve into what infrasound is, the specific allegations made, and the scientific counterarguments that shed light on the reality of data center noise.
Infrasound refers to sound waves with frequencies below the lower limit of human audibility, generally considered to be around 20 Hertz (Hz). While we cannot consciously hear infrasound, it is a natural part of our environment. Sources of infrasound are diverse and include natural phenomena like wind, ocean waves, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions. Man-made sources can also generate these low-frequency vibrations, such as heavy machinery, large wind turbines, and, potentially, industrial facilities like data centers. The physical mechanisms by which infrasound is produced typically involve large-scale air movements or vibrations of solid objects. For instance, large fans moving significant volumes of air can create pressure fluctuations at very low frequencies. Similarly, the mechanical operation of heavy equipment, like pumps or transformers, can induce vibrations that propagate as infrasound.
Benn Jordan, a prominent figure in the cybersecurity and data center community, has brought attention to alleged issues concerning data center infrasound. His concerns, often shared through online platforms and discussions, posit that the immense scale and operation of modern data centers could be generating infrasound levels that may have adverse effects on human health and well-being. The core of these claims often relates to the consistent, powerful operation of cooling systems, particularly large fans used for ventilation and thermal management, as well as the vibrations from numerous power distribution units and backup generators. Jordan and others who echo these concerns suggest that prolonged exposure to these sub-audible frequencies, even if not consciously perceived, could lead to symptoms like fatigue, headaches, anxiety, and other physiological disturbances. The argument is that the sheer density of equipment and the continuous operation required for a data center create a unique environment where infrasound generation could be more pronounced and persistent than in other industrial settings.
When scientific scrutiny is applied, the claims surrounding harmful data center infrasound often fall short. While it is true that data centers generate noise, the specific concerns about health-impacting infrasound are largely unsubstantiated by rigorous research. Professional acoustic engineers who specialize in industrial noise mitigation regularly conduct detailed sound surveys within data centers. These surveys measure sound across a wide spectrum, including the infrasonic range. Standard industry practices for noise control in data centers focus on reducing audible noise and ensuring the comfort and safety of personnel within operational areas. The equipment used, such as computer room air conditioners (CRACs) and precision air conditioning (PAC) units, are designed with noise reduction in mind. Moreover, the physical design of data centers, with their substantial construction and often isolated locations, tends to dampen sound transmission, including low-frequency vibrations, before they can propagate significantly into surrounding environments.
Furthermore, the threshold for infrasound to have a *perceptible* physiological effect is quite high, often requiring levels significantly beyond what typical industrial equipment generates. Research into the effects of infrasound, such as studies documented by environmental agencies like the EPA, suggests that while extremely high levels of infrasound can cause discomfort or physiological responses, the levels commonly measured around even large industrial facilities, including data centers, rarely approach these thresholds. The vast majority of data center noise is within the audible spectrum, and even then, sound levels are managed to comply with occupational safety standards. For more on environmental noise challenges, you can explore resources from the EPA’s current and future challenges regarding air pollution, which also touches upon noise as a form of pollution.
The consensus among acoustic engineers and environmental health experts is that the risks associated with data center infrasound as claimed by some are significantly overstated. Specialists in acoustics emphasize that while infrasound is present in many environments, its generation and propagation are subject to physical laws. Very low-frequency sound waves can travel long distances, but their energy dissipates over distance. For infrasound generated within a data center to pose a threat to personnel or the surrounding community, the source would need to be exceptionally powerful, and the sound would need to overcome the building’s insulation and distance without significant attenuation. Industry guidelines and regulations for noise levels in workplaces are primarily concerned with audible sound that can cause hearing damage or distraction. While monitoring for infrasound is part of comprehensive acoustic surveys, these analyses rarely reveal levels that are considered hazardous or even noticeably impactful in a typical data center environment. You can find more in-depth discussions on data center infrastructure and related technologies on sites like Data Center Dynamics.
The complexity of acoustic measurements and the interpretation of infrasound data are crucial here. Distinguishing between genuine infrasound, structural vibrations, and even psychological perception can be challenging. Without carefully calibrated equipment and rigorous scientific methodology, anecdotal reports or preliminary measurements can be misleading. The focus of established data center design and operation is on reliable power, cooling, and network infrastructure, as detailed in our own coverage of data center categories. Acoustic considerations are a part of this, but primarily for audible noise and compliance.
The actual noise concern within data centers primarily revolves around audible frequencies. The constant operation of cooling fans, servers, and power equipment does produce a significant amount of sound in the audible range. This noise, if unmitigated, can exceed safe occupational exposure limits and negatively impact employee comfort and productivity. However, the data center industry has developed sophisticated methods to manage audible noise. These include:
These measures are effective in keeping audible noise levels within acceptable limits, typically below 85 decibels (dBA) for prolonged exposure, and often much lower in control rooms or office spaces within the facility. The focus remains on the audible spectrum because it is the primary source of potential disruption and the area where established mitigation techniques are most effective. For insights into security measures, which often intersect with operational integrity in these facilities, see our articles on security topics.
As data centers continue to evolve, driven by increasing demand for computing power and artificial intelligence, acoustic management will remain a critical aspect of their design and operation. Future trends may include even more advanced noise reduction technologies, greater integration of smart cooling systems that optimize airflow and energy use while minimizing sound, and more sophisticated real-time acoustic monitoring. The ongoing research into human response to sound, including the subtle effects of very low frequencies, will continue to inform best practices. However, the current scientific understanding and technological capabilities suggest that the unfounded fears surrounding significant health impacts from data center infrasound are unlikely to materialize if standard engineering practices and regulations are followed. Continuous innovation in hardware and construction techniques will likely lead to even quieter and more efficient data centers in the years to come.
The primary potential sources of infrasound in a data center are large industrial fans used in cooling systems (like CRACs and PACs) and the mechanical vibrations from heavy equipment such as power transformers, UPS systems, and backup generators. These devices move large volumes of air or operate with significant mechanical components that can generate vibrations at frequencies below 20 Hz.
While there are established regulations for audible noise levels in occupational settings (e.g., OSHA in the US), specific legal mandates for monitoring infrasound are less common and depend heavily on local environmental and occupational health regulations. However, comprehensive acoustic surveys conducted by professional acousticians may include infrasound measurements as part of a thorough assessment, especially if concerns are raised or if the facility operates under strict environmental permits.
Generally, humans cannot “hear” infrasound. While extremely high levels of infrasound can potentially be felt as vibrations or cause subtle physiological effects like discomfort or pressure sensations, the levels typically found around operational data centers are well below these thresholds. Most perceived physical sensations or discomfort are more likely attributable to audible noise, vibrations transmitted through the flooring, or other environmental factors rather than infrasound itself.
Infrasound has frequencies below 20 Hz, which are inaudible to humans. Audible sound, on the other hand, falls within the range of 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz and is the type of sound we can consciously perceive. Data centers produce both; however, the audible sound from fans and equipment is typically the focus of noise control efforts due to its loudness and potential to exceed occupational safety limits, whereas infrasound is less likely to reach levels of concern.
In conclusion, while the concept of data center infrasound has been raised as a potential concern, the available scientific evidence and expert consensus indicate that it is not a significant threat. Data centers do generate various sounds, including low-frequency vibrations, but modern engineering practices and the physical characteristics of sound propagation mean that these emissions rarely reach levels that pose a risk to human health or well-being. The focus on audible noise mitigation is appropriate and effective, ensuring that data centers are safe and functional environments. As technology advances, the acoustics of these vital facilities will continue to be managed responsibly.
Discover more content from our partner network.